Islam, Child marriage and pedophilia
There is a very strong link between Islam, paedophillia and child marriage.
Now we all know that Islam's prophet married, and had sex with a girl under ten years old.
Because of Muhammad, Muslims are allowed to marry underage girls, it is because of The Sunnah, that Muslims are allowed to do this.
The Sunnah is Muhammed's habits, traditions. Basically his lifestyle, his example, it's the way he lived, that is what The Sunnah is.
If Muhammed did something, then it is in The Sunnah. Like for example if he liked to kill Dogs (he did) then killing Dogs would be in The Sunnah.
Now here's the important bit, anything in The Sunnah, is allowed to be done by Muslims in Islam, in other words anything Muhammad did, Muslims are also allowed to do.
As I have already mentioned, Muhammad married a little girl when he was an adult. If Muhammed didn't see a problem with marrying a little girl, if he didn't see marrying a little girl as morally wrong, then Muslims don't have to either, as in the Islamic faith, anything in the Sunnah, anything Muhammed did basically, is allowed to be done by Muslims.
It is the reason why Muslim men are allowed to marry little girls. As anything Muhammed did, is allowed to be done by Muslims, as it is in The Sunnah.
In Islamic countries, if the girl's father gives permission, a Muslim man can force an underage girl to marry him. This is all Muhammad needed to justifiy his marriage to a little girl - that the girl's father had given him permission to marry her. Child marriage is allowed in many Islamic and Muslim countries, such as Yemen, Saudi Arabia, Bangladesh, Pakistan etc....
One of the most shocking cases of child marriage in Islam was when a Muslim man in his twenties married a six month old baby, and this happened only a few years ago!
Islam is stuck in the 7th century, unwilling to change, in Islamic countries. Child marriage in Islam is just one of the many sick part of the horribleness and vileness of Islamic idelogy in it's original form.
Islam is the only religion that justifies forced child marriage in the modern world, we need to make people know about paedophillia, and the fact that it's prophet is at the heart of child marriage in Islam.
By WATB
Tuesday, 15 February 2011
Thursday, 21 October 2010
The government's failure
We hear of the Taliban talk about the people they have living in the UK, the people who would blow themselves up if the Taliban sends them the order.
We hear of radical Islam spreading in universities, we hear about how students are intimidated in these universities by Islamists.
We hear of the attacks on non-Muslims, attacked simply because they weren't Muslim. And are these attacks dealt with by the police? No! In the name of "community cohesion" they are ignored.
We hear again and again of failed terrorist attacks. Does the government ever wonder why these Muslims are being radicalised? One of the 7/7 bombers was radicalised in a Leeds university. Undercover Mosque showed hate being preached in Mosques all over the UK, and what did the government do? Nothing!
Islam, a radical religion, is spreading all over the UK. The sensible and right thing for the British government to do would be to order the investigation of all Mosques and making sure they are regulated. And also freeze the construction of Mosques. The government has done none of these things.
The government is not tackling radical Islam.
So if a Muslim is radicalised in a university or a Mosque and blows himself up, then the government would have to accept some responsibility. As they have failed to deal with radical Islam in Britain.
We hear about the Muslim gangs. We hear about pubs, community buildings and parks being demolished or bought so that another Mosque would be built there.
We hear about Islamist groups planning to protest against military homecoming parades, we've seen it happen before, and yet these groups are allowed to do it. British soldiers who have been sent to Afghanistan are in the warzone for months, away from their families, risking their lives, and when they attend their homecoming parades they should not, and I repeat, they should not have to endure taunts and being spat at by radical Muslims.
And the government allows this to happen.
It's a disgrace.
The situation in Britain is getting worse. The government needs to act.
And this is why the EDL and the other Defence Leagues are very important. The Defence League movement will continue to put pressure on the British government to sort out the problem Islam has brought to the UK. The government will have to act when the Defence League demos are attended by tens of thousands of the British people. The government will not be able to ignore the EDL anymore when this happens.
Another very important thing about the Defence Leagues is that they are spreading awareness of the truth about Islam.
By WATB.
We hear of radical Islam spreading in universities, we hear about how students are intimidated in these universities by Islamists.
We hear of the attacks on non-Muslims, attacked simply because they weren't Muslim. And are these attacks dealt with by the police? No! In the name of "community cohesion" they are ignored.
We hear again and again of failed terrorist attacks. Does the government ever wonder why these Muslims are being radicalised? One of the 7/7 bombers was radicalised in a Leeds university. Undercover Mosque showed hate being preached in Mosques all over the UK, and what did the government do? Nothing!
Islam, a radical religion, is spreading all over the UK. The sensible and right thing for the British government to do would be to order the investigation of all Mosques and making sure they are regulated. And also freeze the construction of Mosques. The government has done none of these things.
The government is not tackling radical Islam.
So if a Muslim is radicalised in a university or a Mosque and blows himself up, then the government would have to accept some responsibility. As they have failed to deal with radical Islam in Britain.
We hear about the Muslim gangs. We hear about pubs, community buildings and parks being demolished or bought so that another Mosque would be built there.
We hear about Islamist groups planning to protest against military homecoming parades, we've seen it happen before, and yet these groups are allowed to do it. British soldiers who have been sent to Afghanistan are in the warzone for months, away from their families, risking their lives, and when they attend their homecoming parades they should not, and I repeat, they should not have to endure taunts and being spat at by radical Muslims.
And the government allows this to happen.
It's a disgrace.
The situation in Britain is getting worse. The government needs to act.
And this is why the EDL and the other Defence Leagues are very important. The Defence League movement will continue to put pressure on the British government to sort out the problem Islam has brought to the UK. The government will have to act when the Defence League demos are attended by tens of thousands of the British people. The government will not be able to ignore the EDL anymore when this happens.
Another very important thing about the Defence Leagues is that they are spreading awareness of the truth about Islam.
By WATB.
Thursday, 23 September 2010
UAF
Unite Against Fascism (UAF) often accuse the EDL of being a violent group, but the UAF need to be honest about who is more reponsible for violence, the UAF or the EDL.
On 20th March, the English Defence League held a demonstration against Islamism and Shariah/Sharia Law. The UAF (as usual) counter-demonstrated. An interview on BBC Five Live exposed the UAF's violence that day. During the interview, a member of the public, who was completely uninvolved with the EDL or UAF, told her story of what she had seen.
The member of the public told of how she went shopping in Bolton that day, and she saw the UAF's demonstration. She told of how the UAF were causing trouble and attacking the police. The EDL had not even arrived yet. According to the woman being interviewed, the UAF were thugs.
Her account of the story is backed by a video I have seen, which shows UAF members trying to bring down a fence. The EDL had probably not even arrived yet. There is a link to the video at the end of this blog entry.
The evidence I have seen elsewhere, has suggested the UAF were trying to break through police lines to get to where the EDL were going to demonstrate. If this is true, it means the UAF were trying to stop a legal demonstration. Which shows their anti-freespeech tendencies. By the end of the day, after the EDL had demonstrated, there had been between 70 to 80 people arrested. 55 were from the UAF.
Those arrested included the UAF Joint Secretary Weyman Bennett, and senior member Martin Smith.
There's more. As if the violence of the UAF at Bolton wasn't enough, we hear the news of Martin Smith's court case.
Yes at a UAF protest against the BNP, a police officer was allegedly assaulted by Martin Smith who also happens to be a senior member of the UAF. He now has a criminal record for assaulting a police officer.
You see, the UAF don't believe in peaceful protests, if they did they wouldn't incite hundreds of Muslims to go into violent frenzies, like in Tower Hamlets where their scaremongering caused Muslims to go into an anti-white frenzy on more than one occasion. Yes the UAF do like scare-mongering. We all know that.
There are signs the UAF are losing their impact, their numbers at their recent protests were mostly numbering hundreds, not thousands like the EDL's demos have. Honestly, the UAF for laughing at now. If you look at their website you will see them talk about the support they are getting, but the support is really from Trade Unions and rappers, singers etc that I've never heard of.
Anyway, the UAF are a group of violent Socialists/Marxists. What's new?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XO545I2vSeo&feature=fvsr
Monday, 13 September 2010
Standing up to hate
In London, on the 11th of September, an Islamic group called Muslims Against Crusades protested outside the US Embassy.
The group chanted Islamist chants, burned the flags of countries, and generally were very hateful. These Muslims want the UK to be destroyed, they display this openly. They burned the US flag on the very day that nine years ago America was attacked.
Why were they even allowed to demonstrate?
If a fundamentalist Christian group wanted to burn the flag of Pakistan outside the Pakistan Embassy, the group would probably be banned from doing that. But if a Muslim group wants to burn the flag of a country (outside the countries embassy) they are allowed to do so.
It is because the MAC is a Muslim group, that the MAC was allowed to do what they did and that none of them were arrested. If it hadn't have been for the EDL, these Islamists would have been unchallenged.
Something is wrong, if an Islamic hate group can burn flags, and call for the destruction of America on September 11th, unchallenged. We need to stand up to these Muslim radicals, or they will continue to grow stronger. The Government, politicians and Police have allowed radical Islam and appeasement, to go unchallenged, for far too long. It is now up to ordinary members of the British public to fight for their country, and to stand up to an ideology that wants to destroy the UK as we know it.
The EDL has progressed so much against all the odds. With all the PC madness holding down Britain, it has taken a long time recently for a movement to emerge, that will fight for Britain, that will have no fear, and that is not afraid to show it's patriotism. Well that movement has finally emerged, in the form of the EDL, giving the British public the voice that it had lost.
We will win, Islam and it's allies won't stop us.
By WATB
The group chanted Islamist chants, burned the flags of countries, and generally were very hateful. These Muslims want the UK to be destroyed, they display this openly. They burned the US flag on the very day that nine years ago America was attacked.
Why were they even allowed to demonstrate?
If a fundamentalist Christian group wanted to burn the flag of Pakistan outside the Pakistan Embassy, the group would probably be banned from doing that. But if a Muslim group wants to burn the flag of a country (outside the countries embassy) they are allowed to do so.
It is because the MAC is a Muslim group, that the MAC was allowed to do what they did and that none of them were arrested. If it hadn't have been for the EDL, these Islamists would have been unchallenged.
Something is wrong, if an Islamic hate group can burn flags, and call for the destruction of America on September 11th, unchallenged. We need to stand up to these Muslim radicals, or they will continue to grow stronger. The Government, politicians and Police have allowed radical Islam and appeasement, to go unchallenged, for far too long. It is now up to ordinary members of the British public to fight for their country, and to stand up to an ideology that wants to destroy the UK as we know it.
The EDL has progressed so much against all the odds. With all the PC madness holding down Britain, it has taken a long time recently for a movement to emerge, that will fight for Britain, that will have no fear, and that is not afraid to show it's patriotism. Well that movement has finally emerged, in the form of the EDL, giving the British public the voice that it had lost.
We will win, Islam and it's allies won't stop us.
By WATB
Friday, 27 August 2010
Political Correctness and anti-White racism
Political Correctness and the discrimination of White Britons.
Liverpool Council withdrew funding of an annual military parade in Liverpool. The reason? Because "it was not diverse enough". The Council denied this was the reason. The organizers of the military parade said that the Liverpool Council had told them the parade did not rate high enough in it's "Diversity scale". So a brilliant Military show that would have been enjoyed by many families, was cancelled because it wasn't diverse enough. It was Political Correctness that made Liverpool cancel this parade - an example of Political Correctness gone mad.
Another example of Political Correctness gone mad, is the discrimination of White people by Bristol City Council. The Council offered two trainee management positions to job seekers, but there is a twist, only ethnic minorities would be allowed the job.
Bristol City Council said that White Britons would not be allowed the job. Bristol City Council used what is called "Positive discrimination". Positive discrimination is when White Britons are not allowed certain jobs because the proportion of ethnic minority workers is not in proportion of White Briton workers in the area. This is racism, anti-White racism and this is largely ignored by most Leftists, some Leftists are completely ignorant to this anti-White racism, while others don't care.
I have been thinking recently, if there are jobs that are for Ethnic minorities only, should there be jobs that are for White Britons only? Let me explain this further.
There are many areas of Britain where White Britons are in the minority, Peckham for example, the population of Peckham is only 25.73% White. Now if it was revealed that in Peckham, the proportion of White Briton workers was not in proportion of Ethnic minority workers, would it be fair to have jobs for White Britons only? if the same is done for Ethnic Minorities in Bristol.
Political Correctness allows anti-White discrimination to happen for the benefit of ethnic minorities - exactly what Bristol City Council has done.
My conclusion of Political Correctness :
White Britons suffer the most from Political Correctness. Political Correctness, if allowed unchecked, causes anti-White discrimination to become so acceptable, that City Councils are able to openly discriminate against White Britons - as shown by the actions of Bristol City Council.
By WATB
Liverpool Council withdrew funding of an annual military parade in Liverpool. The reason? Because "it was not diverse enough". The Council denied this was the reason. The organizers of the military parade said that the Liverpool Council had told them the parade did not rate high enough in it's "Diversity scale". So a brilliant Military show that would have been enjoyed by many families, was cancelled because it wasn't diverse enough. It was Political Correctness that made Liverpool cancel this parade - an example of Political Correctness gone mad.
Another example of Political Correctness gone mad, is the discrimination of White people by Bristol City Council. The Council offered two trainee management positions to job seekers, but there is a twist, only ethnic minorities would be allowed the job.
Bristol City Council said that White Britons would not be allowed the job. Bristol City Council used what is called "Positive discrimination". Positive discrimination is when White Britons are not allowed certain jobs because the proportion of ethnic minority workers is not in proportion of White Briton workers in the area. This is racism, anti-White racism and this is largely ignored by most Leftists, some Leftists are completely ignorant to this anti-White racism, while others don't care.
I have been thinking recently, if there are jobs that are for Ethnic minorities only, should there be jobs that are for White Britons only? Let me explain this further.
There are many areas of Britain where White Britons are in the minority, Peckham for example, the population of Peckham is only 25.73% White. Now if it was revealed that in Peckham, the proportion of White Briton workers was not in proportion of Ethnic minority workers, would it be fair to have jobs for White Britons only? if the same is done for Ethnic Minorities in Bristol.
Political Correctness allows anti-White discrimination to happen for the benefit of ethnic minorities - exactly what Bristol City Council has done.
My conclusion of Political Correctness :
White Britons suffer the most from Political Correctness. Political Correctness, if allowed unchecked, causes anti-White discrimination to become so acceptable, that City Councils are able to openly discriminate against White Britons - as shown by the actions of Bristol City Council.
By WATB
Thursday, 26 August 2010
Comparison of Islamic countries and Parts of Bradford
I wanted to do a comparison of Islamic countries and some parts of Bradford.
Islamic countries:
In Islamic countries non-Muslims don't have freedom of religion. In Saudi Arabia for example, proselytizing by non-Muslims (attempting to convert people to another religion) is illegal, and if anyone leaves the Islamic faith, they are subject to the death penalty. In Islamic countries, non-Muslims have to deal with intimidation at a daily basis. Non-Muslims are oppressed in Islamic countries because they are not Muslims.
Parts of Bradford:
In some parts of Bradford, Islam is the dominant faith - just like in Islamic countries. Churches in these areas of Bradford often have to deal with violence aimed at them - just like in Islamic countries. In these areas, non-Muslims are intimidated at a daily basis - just like in Islamic countries. In these areas, any religious parades and rallys for non-Muslims face violence - just like in Islamic countries.
Parts of Bradford now resemble Islamic countries. This shows what happens when Islam is accepted as a normal religion.
Islamic countries:
In Islamic countries non-Muslims don't have freedom of religion. In Saudi Arabia for example, proselytizing by non-Muslims (attempting to convert people to another religion) is illegal, and if anyone leaves the Islamic faith, they are subject to the death penalty. In Islamic countries, non-Muslims have to deal with intimidation at a daily basis. Non-Muslims are oppressed in Islamic countries because they are not Muslims.
Parts of Bradford:
In some parts of Bradford, Islam is the dominant faith - just like in Islamic countries. Churches in these areas of Bradford often have to deal with violence aimed at them - just like in Islamic countries. In these areas, non-Muslims are intimidated at a daily basis - just like in Islamic countries. In these areas, any religious parades and rallys for non-Muslims face violence - just like in Islamic countries.
Parts of Bradford now resemble Islamic countries. This shows what happens when Islam is accepted as a normal religion.
Friday, 20 August 2010
Is There an Islamic Takeover Of The UK?
Today I will type my answer to the question.
Is there an Islamic takeover of the UK?
The UK is not in the verge of being taken over by Islam- far from it, but there are areas of Britain that could be justifiably described as currently being taken over. Bradford for example. Nearly one third of Bradford's population is Muslim, and the results have been disastrous. There are many no-go areas for Whites after dark, and the city experienced severe rioting by the Muslim youth. Bradford is described as a place that is still recovering from these riots, and although the Muslim youth may have been "provoked by the National Front", the fact still remains that it was the Muslim youth that did the rioting.
Large areas of Bradford are close to being populated only by Muslims, areas that were not like that before. Areas that are now no-go areas for Whites after dark- there are attacks on Whites by Muslims all the time that are motivated religiously or racially, but are never described as racist attacks by the media.
In January 1999, police records of racial attacks showed that 52 per cent of victims were white, 9 per cent black and 35 per cent Asian. This was in 1999 so imagine how much anti-White racism happens in Bradford since that time.
Bradford can now be described as currently being taken over by Islam.
Now its time to speak about appeasement.
KFC used Halal-only meat in some stores for a period of time and Bacon has been banned in some KFC stores. This is one of the many signs that Muslims, even though they are a minority, bring many unwelcome changes that affect the majority. Changes that affect non-Muslims. Buisnesses, associations, and councils are all too eager to appease Muslims. They are afraid of the consequences that would follow, if they didn't appease them. They are afraid of being labeled racists and "Islamophobes".
In the West Midlands town of Darlaston, the windows of a swimming pool were blacked out due to complaints by the Muslim community. It turns out many Muslims wanted to protect "Muslim Women's Modesty". This is another example of appeasement by Councils, of one section of the community, while ignoring what the majority want.
People are too afraid to speak out, as they will be accused of being racist and "Islamophobic".
My conclusion:
Will the UK be taken over and converted into an Islamic state?
The answer is...... the UK will NOT be taken over.
Why?
Because the British people will not let it happen. For now the Islamic takeover of the UK is still happening, some areas more than others, but as more areas are transformed beyond recognition, more of the British public will wake up.
By WATB.
Is there an Islamic takeover of the UK?
The UK is not in the verge of being taken over by Islam- far from it, but there are areas of Britain that could be justifiably described as currently being taken over. Bradford for example. Nearly one third of Bradford's population is Muslim, and the results have been disastrous. There are many no-go areas for Whites after dark, and the city experienced severe rioting by the Muslim youth. Bradford is described as a place that is still recovering from these riots, and although the Muslim youth may have been "provoked by the National Front", the fact still remains that it was the Muslim youth that did the rioting.
Large areas of Bradford are close to being populated only by Muslims, areas that were not like that before. Areas that are now no-go areas for Whites after dark- there are attacks on Whites by Muslims all the time that are motivated religiously or racially, but are never described as racist attacks by the media.
In January 1999, police records of racial attacks showed that 52 per cent of victims were white, 9 per cent black and 35 per cent Asian. This was in 1999 so imagine how much anti-White racism happens in Bradford since that time.
Bradford can now be described as currently being taken over by Islam.
Now its time to speak about appeasement.
KFC used Halal-only meat in some stores for a period of time and Bacon has been banned in some KFC stores. This is one of the many signs that Muslims, even though they are a minority, bring many unwelcome changes that affect the majority. Changes that affect non-Muslims. Buisnesses, associations, and councils are all too eager to appease Muslims. They are afraid of the consequences that would follow, if they didn't appease them. They are afraid of being labeled racists and "Islamophobes".
In the West Midlands town of Darlaston, the windows of a swimming pool were blacked out due to complaints by the Muslim community. It turns out many Muslims wanted to protect "Muslim Women's Modesty". This is another example of appeasement by Councils, of one section of the community, while ignoring what the majority want.
People are too afraid to speak out, as they will be accused of being racist and "Islamophobic".
My conclusion:
Will the UK be taken over and converted into an Islamic state?
The answer is...... the UK will NOT be taken over.
Why?
Because the British people will not let it happen. For now the Islamic takeover of the UK is still happening, some areas more than others, but as more areas are transformed beyond recognition, more of the British public will wake up.
By WATB.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)